Security review for SaaS apps

Find broken permissions before launch.

We review app roles, routes, tenant rules, and billing flows. You get clear findings your engineers can fix.

patchhound/auth

patchhound/attack

patchhound/protect

patchhound / billing-portal

Secrets rejected

deterministic exploit path

Role is trusted too early

A server route accepts client metadata.

Tenant check is too broad

Invoice data can cross accounts.

Billing action misses ownership

A refund can run on the wrong invoice.

Authorized scope

Confirm who can submit the app.

Secrets blocked

Token-shaped content is rejected before review.

Fix list

Findings include evidence and next steps.

Authorization first

No anonymous scanning. Every workspace records who is allowed to submit the system.

Token-shaped content is rejected before storage, so reviews can happen without live credentials.

Patchhound reports how a bug moves from auth to data to billing instead of listing isolated warnings.

workflow

Submit the pieces that matter. Patchhound keeps the scope, evidence, and remediation notes together.

Create workspace

Attest ownership

Submit artifacts

Reject secrets

Generate scan

Open findings

Patchhound shows risky permission paths without pretending an upload replaces human security ownership.